Skip to main content
Sunday, July 13, 2025
Home
Omaha Daily Record
  • Login
  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • Calendar
    • Real Estate
    • Small Business
    • Non-Profit
    • Political
    • Legal
  • Podcasts
    • Real Estate
    • Small Business
    • Non-Profit
    • Political
    • Legal
  • Profiles
    • Real Estate
    • Small Business
    • Non-Profit
    • Political
    • Legal
  • E-Edition
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
  • Real Estate News
    • Market Trends
  • Business News
  • Non-Profit News
  • Political News
  • Legal News
  • Editorial
    • Empower You
    • The Serial Entrepreneur
    • Tom Becka
  • Other News
  • Public Records
    • Wreck Permits
    • Building Permits
    • Electrical Permits
    • Mechanical Permits
    • Plumbing Permits
  • Real Estate Leads
    • Notice of Default
    • Active Property Sales
    • Active Probates
    • Deeds
  • Public Notices
    • State of Nebraska
    • City of Bennington
    • City of Gretna
    • City of Valley
    • Douglas County West Community Schools
    • Gretna Public Schools
    • Omaha Airport Authority
    • Omaha Housing Authority
    • Plattsmouth Community Schools
    • City of Omaha
    • Douglas County
      • Tax Delinqueny 2025
    • City/County Notice of Bids
    • City of Ralston
    • Omaha Public Schools
    • Millard Public Schools
    • Ralston Public Schools
    • Westside Community Schools
    • Bennington Public Schools
    • Learning Community
    • MAPA
    • MECA
    • Omaha Airport Authority
    • Village of Boys Town
    • Village of Waterloo
    • Sarpy County
      • Tax Delinquency 2025
    • City of Bellevue
  • Advertise
    • Place a Legal Notice
    • Place a Print Ad
    • Place a Classified Ad
    • Place an Online Ad
    • Place Sponsored Content
  • Available For Hire
    • Real Estate
      • Contractors
      • Clerical
    • Legal
      • Paralegal
      • Clerical
  • About
    • Our History
    • Our Office
    • Our Staff
    • Contact Us

You are here

Home » Stare Decisis is Very Fluid and Not Necessarily Ideological

Stare Decisis is Very Fluid and Not Necessarily Ideological

Published by Nikki Palmer on Wed, 12/08/2021 - 12:00am
By 
Richard Shugrue
The Daily Record

So long, Roe and Casey!

That’s the main take away from last Wednesday’s Supreme Court argument in the Mississippi abortion case testing the constitutionality of a 15-week limit after which the state bans most pregnancy terminations.

Just about every pundit has had her or his oar in the murky waters of speculation over whether a court with six conservatives would gut a woman’s right to choose, leaving it pretty much to the states to treat the issue as their often-reactionary legislatures want.

Some commentators said — up ’til last Wednesday morning — that Chief Justice Roberts and newcomers Amy Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh would tilt in favor of stare decisis.

They would side with the three liberals and at least save the core of the half-century-old precedent.

Then these three justices opened their traps and everything they had said with straight faces during their confirmation hearings was tossed aside.

One of the smartest observers — Dahlia Lithwick of Slate — accused them of “gaslighting” and down-right lying.

Justice Clarence Thomas has been for trashing Roe for 30 years, although he told an audience at Creighton many years ago that the rule of the case was “settled law.” Justice Samuel Alito has made no bones about his opposition to Roe and Casey. Justice Neil Gorsuch, the first Trump appointment, fulfilled The Donald’s vow to destroy women’s right to reproductive freedom.

Putting aside the doctrine of viability, which is at the core of the decades-old cases, what’s in store for the rights of privacy and autonomy? These are the very heart of cases such as Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), which upheld the use of contraceptives by married women, and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), upholding the constitutionality of same sex marriages.

There is no specific “right to privacy” in the U.S. Constitution, but Justice William O. Douglas reasoned in Griswold that it could be deduced from several rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights. With no text underpinning rights pronounced in these cases, jurists who don’t believe in sexual autonomy could put them all on the chopping block.

Liberals lamenting the overruling of Roe and Casey should at least read a piece by CNN producer Ryan Struyk in 2018, listing more than 300 Supreme Court decisions overturned by the court.

Those overturned decisions include old standbys from Con Law like Hammer v. Dagenhart to many rulings progressives swear by, including Casey itself.

It turns out that stare decisis is very fluid and not necessarily ideological. The Supreme Court itself bends with its cast of characters and only those unfamiliar with history are conned into believing the justices were really selected for their wisdom and fairness and not because the president at the moment thought the judge would vote the “right” way.

So, Mr. Trump, it looks like your three appointees will make it an overwhelming majority to do away with a woman’s right to control her own reproductive destiny.

Richard Shugrue is a professor emeritus at the Creighton University School of Law and a columnist for The Daily Record.

User login

  • Request new password

            

Latest Podcasts

  • Real Estate
  • Political
  • Political
  • Real Estate

Nebraska Landlord

Betches Sup - A Liberal News Commentary

Ruthless - A Conservative News Commentary

REIA Radio Show

Omaha Daily Record

The Daily Record
222 South 72nd Street, Suite 302
Omaha, Nebraska
68114
United States

Tele (402) 345-1303
Fax (402) 345-2351
 

The Daily Record
222 South 72nd Street, Suite 302 | Omaha, Nebraska 68114 | United States | Tele (402) 345-1303 | Fax (402) 345-2351 | Sitemap
Site Design, Programming & Development by Surf New Media