The unfortunate advent of Legislative Bill 552 in the Nebraska Legislature’s hopper once again exposes the tentacles of national politics creeping into the state’s process of making policy.

State Sen. Loren Lippincott’s proposed law would require public Nebraska postsecondary institutions to forgo anything that remotely resembles a nod toward diversity, equity and inclusion, known as DEI, the latest histrionic being promulgated by the current White House.

Indeed, the removal of any vestige of efforts to give those in marginalized groups opportunities historically unavailable to them has a prime position in the president’s executive order parade.

Lippincott ratcheted up his argument for LB 552 with a recent newspaper column in which he related several personal anecdotes of problems from his commercial airline pilot days, the result, apparently, of the skin color of air traffic controllers and their bosses.

His point appeared to be a classic case of projection — pushing for the idea that we shouldn’t be making decisions based on skin color when he did just that.

Facts Matter

DEI detractors insist we should be developing a “colorblind” society, one based strictly on “merit.” That means jobs, college admissions, promotions, contracts, whatever would be awarded according to ability. Fine … except for the facts. You remember the facts don’t you?

For starters, tell us just how individuals can prove merit when their race, gender, sexuality, age, culture, language, religion or even their opinion keeps them from getting a chance to do so. Moreover, too often those wagging a finger in our faces about merit are preaching to an endless on-deck circle from where they started: on third base.

Plus, merit-based systems rarely achieve their goals because we’ve baked favoritism into the process. Getting inside that track remains all but impossible for a wide swath of Americans, many of whom are in communities which anti-DEI sentiments aim to keep on the sidelines.

In his book “Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good?” Harvard professor Michael Sandel, addressing scandals in college admissions, wrote “… the problem with meritocracy is not with the principle but with our failure to live up to it.”

Meritocracies thrive when the proverbial playing field is level. For example, while a standardized test is designed to reward and expose merit, the data clearly shows that a student’s family income is a more common predictor of scores than absolute merit.

Ironically, it’s often sports, what some call the toy department of life, where ability wins out … along with diversity, equity and inclusion. For details, head to a game near you.

Room To Decide

The impetus for much of today’s infatuation with undermining DEI efforts is the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in 2023 to end affirmative action. But, as University of Chicago law professor Sonja Starr wrote recently, the Supremes’ decision “did not render racial diversity an unlawful interest — indeed, it described that interest as ‘commendable’ and ‘worthy.’ Courts have long distinguished between ‘benign’ racial objectives, such as diversity, and ‘invidious’ ones, such as segregation. The Supreme Court did not change that distinction. What it changed were the means that schools can use to pursue diversity: They now must be race-neutral.”

To which I might add a private sector update: After behemoths such as Walmart, Target, Amazon and McDonald’s did away with DEI efforts, in the last couple weeks shareholders at Apple and John Deere joined Costco in rejecting efforts to eighty-six DEI programs. The votes were not close.

LB 552 has some troubling details, too.

For example, the law includes the prohibition of “Describing structures, systems, relations of power, privilege, or subordination on the basis of race, sex, color, gender, ethnicity, gender identity, or sexual orientation.”

To this layman, that sounds as though we’re prohibiting college students from getting instruction that details the causes, conditions and consequences of slavery, as well as accounts that reveal seminal chapters in our American history such as the Stonewall Uprising, the Tuskegee narratives — both the airmen and the syphilis studies, the work of Cesar Chavez and the eventual formation of the United Farm Workers and the path Ruth Bader-Ginsberg took to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Most troubling in the anti-DEI movement, however, is the tone and tenor of the discussion, which on the low end reminds Amercians that left unchecked, such language and attitudes can and have eventually ended with brownshirts and white hoods.

Let’s give the state’s public colleges and the University of Nebraska unfettered license to challenge its faculty, administrators and students to find true merit in diversity, equity and inclusion efforts rather than to make believe the fields of play and progress are always level.

This story was published by Nebraska Examiner, an editorially independent newsroom providing a hard-hitting, daily flow of news. Read the original article: https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/03/03/meritocratic-myths-of-the-playin...